Quantcast
Channel: News

Mayor Soiseth Strips Councilwoman Bublak of Appointments, Potential Brown Act Violation

$
0
0
Mayor Soiseth Strips Councilwoman Bublak of Appointments, Potential Brown Act Violation
Taking away appointments, while hooking up someone else with more travel budget, and discussing it all behind the scenes with an agreed voting bloc usually is something Turlockers only hear about happening in Sacramento politics as some form of retribution or trading for votes. However, this is happening right here under the direction of Turlock Mayor Gary Soiseth. Most everyone was surprised or shocked when Mayor Soiseth stripped Councilwoman Amy Bublak of three appointments and dispersed one to each of the three Councilmen. Mayor Soiseth, Councilmen Bill DeHart, Matthew Jacob, and Gil Esquer knew before the meeting while Councilwoman Amy Bublak was not even given a courtesy notice that she would not be serving as a representative of Turlock on some regional committees.
Taking away appointments, while hooking up someone else with more travel budget, and discussing it all behind the scenes with an agreed voting bloc usually is something Turlockers only hear about happening in Sacramento politics as some form of retribution or trading for votes. However, this is happening right here under the direction of Turlock Mayor Gary Soiseth.

Most everyone was surprised or shocked when Mayor Soiseth stripped Councilwoman Amy Bublak of three appointments and dispersed one to each of the three Councilmen. Mayor Soiseth, Councilmen Bill DeHart, Matthew Jacob, and Gil Esquer knew before the meeting while Councilwoman Amy Bublak was not even given a courtesy notice that she would not be serving as a representative of Turlock on some regional committees.

TurlockCityNews.com has asked the City of Turlock if this would be a Brown Act violation, which is a majority of Council (three Turlock City Council Members) discussing voting or taking action on the public’s business but not in public or discussing an agendized item such as the appointments but behind the scenes.

There have been several allegations of Mayor Soiseth violating the Brown Act recently, however, the City of Turlock has not answered questions regarding them and has not even acknowledged that they’re looking into the allegations to have correctly run government. TurlockCityNews.com will continue to follow up on the Brown Act violations to hold government accountable and transparent.
{loadposition banban}
As Mayor Soiseth was taking away the appointments one-by-one from Councilwoman Bublak at the Sept. 26 City Council meeting, Councilwoman Bublak wanted to note that the Council had just passed a resolution against hate, discrimination, and bullying, while promoting diversity.

Councilwoman Bublak was the only female on any of the committees and the only female on the City Council, of which all three appointments were being taken from and dispersed to three other male Council Members.

“We need to think about what we’re doing,” stated Councilwoman Bublak. “If we’re going to say we want inclusion and we don’t want people to be treated differently, then I’m not sure where we’re going with this… ”

Mayor Soiseth reacted by saying, “It has nothing to do with you being a female.”

Councilwoman Bublak did not say or insinuate that is why she was being stripped of three appointments, but was stating fact, referring to the resolution of diversity made just minutes before, and that Council should be mindful of that as leading by example.
{loadposition banban2}
Mayor Soiseth continued to explain, “There needs to be more equity among our Council Members. Councilmember Esquer had only one appointment, so this came to my attention so we’re trying to make sure there’s more equitable appointments among the Council Members. So, I think that’s where it is.”

TurlockCityNews.com made a public records request from the City of Turlock for a list of all appointments held by all Council Members.

Turlock City Clerk Jennifer Land responded by sending a list of four Council Members’ appointments.

The lists included regional appointments that represent Turlock, but also some community workshop groups, and alternates for appointees as well.

Councilwoman Bublak: Community Grant Selection Committee (CDBG), Economic Development Work Group, Stanislaus LAFCO, (Alternate) East Stanislaus Regional Water Management Partnership.

Councilman DeHart: City Schools Committee, League of CA Cities Exec Committee & Annual Voting, Stanislaus Regional Water Authority (SRWA).

Councilman Esquer: (Alternate) San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, (Alternate) StanCOG, (Alternate) West Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agency.

Councilman Jacob: City/County Liaison Committee, Community Grant Selection Committee (CDBG), San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, (Alternate), Economic Development Work Group, (Alternate) League of CA Cities Exec Committee & Annual Voting.

The City of Turlock responded without sending Mayor Soiseth’s list of appointments, so TurlockCityNews.com followed up and requested that as well.

Mayor Soiseth: City/County Disaster Council, City/County Liaison Committee, City Schools Committee, East Stanislaus Regional Water Management Partnership (Management Group), Oversight Board to the Successor Agency to Former RDA, Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG), Stanislaus Regional Water Authority (SRWA), Turlock Public Library Partnership, West Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agency.
{loadposition banban3}
For regional or multi-agency appointments representing Turlock, Councilwoman Bublak has 1 appointment and is an alternate for 1. Councilman DeHart has 3 appointments. Councilman Esquer has 0 and is an alternate for 3. Councilman Jacob 2 appointments and is an alternate for 1. Mayor Soiseth has 9 appointments as a representative of the City of Turlock with other agencies or in regional committees.

Mayor Soiseth has many more appointments and some he could’ve dispersed among the other Council Members, however, he’s the Turlock Mayor. The numbers and intention of equity still don’t quite add up as some community workshop groups are just that, workshops, and alternates are to fill in for the first-chosen appointment if needed.

Councilman Gil Esquer did respond via email stating being only an alternate to three committees was by his own request.

“Being new to this position I need a learning curve until I grasp the actual processes of these committees.”

So with this, equity isn’t really possible with Councilman Esquer’s request.

Also, Councilwoman Bublak is the most senior-sitting Council Member after she won her third election in 2016 and is retired from the Modesto Police Department.

“I have experience, I’ve worked with several different Councils now, I am retired and have time to work for the citizens of Turlock, but… I didn’t know anything about being taken off three appointments and left with what I got - one ‘appointment’ meets once a year to decide grants from the City of Turlock to community efforts - so I’m concerned with what’s going on.”
{loadposition banban4}
Mayor Soiseth has not responded to multiple questions about if he communicated with other Council Members before the agendized item at the public meeting, however, Councilman Matthew Jacob said that he was contacted and Councilman Bill DeHart admitted to talking about it with Mayor Soiseth. After the confirmation of communication with other Councilmen behind the scenes, Mayor Soiseth has not answered questions as to why he communicated with other Council Members but not Councilwoman Bublak, and why he didn’t at least give a courtesy notice to Bublak or explain why before catching her off-guard.

At the Oct. 10 Turlock City Council meeting, Mayor Soiseth appointed Councilman Matthew Jacob as Vice Mayor after reappointing Councilman Bill DeHart, who had been serving as Vice Mayor, to the League of California Cities Executive Committee where he would be Chairman.

Mayor Soiseth also instructed City Staff to take $2,000 from his travel budget and give it to Councilman DeHart.

TurlockCityNews.com will continue to follow up on the Brown Act violations and the incorrectly ran City Council meetings to hold Mayor Soiseth and our local government accountable and transparent.
{loadposition banbanlast}

Fulkerth and Golden State Intersection Anticipated to Reopen by Thanksgiving, Black Friday

$
0
0
Fulkerth and Golden State Intersection Anticipated to Reopen by Thanksgiving, Black Friday
After being closed since Jul. 31, then delayed past mid-September to Nov. 1, and slated to reopen on Nov. 21, the Fulkerth Road and Golden State Boulevard Intersection will be opening just before Thanksgiving and Black Friday holiday shopping. 
After being closed since Jul. 31, then delayed past mid-September to Nov. 1, and slated to reopen on Nov. 21, the Fulkerth Road and Golden State Boulevard Intersection will be opening just before Thanksgiving and Black Friday holiday shopping.

“The City of Turlock anticipates the Fulkerth and Golden State Intersection will open Wednesday night,” Turlock City Clerk Jennifer Land stated in a press release. “The City of Turlock appreciates the community's patience as we increased the safety and efficiency of this highly used intersection.”

The intersection will now have protected left hand turn lanes, safer railroad crossings, more efficient traffic flow, new bike lanes and sidewalks with ADA upgrades, and improved lighting.
{loadposition banban}
Some businesses have reported losses due to the intersection being closed, while many drivers, bikers, and pedestrians have complained about the lack of the thoroughfare and railroad crossing going from east to west across Turlock - from residential to the freeway and shopping surround Wal-Mart.

Many worries as of lately have been regarding the major intersection and thoroughfares being closed as Thanksgiving, Black Friday, and the rest of the holiday shopping season is kicking off.

“Holiday travel is always challenging, however, not nearly as much in Turlock,” stated Councilwoman and Economic Development Committee Chair Amy Bublak. “Come shop at our local businesses now that our major intersections are all open.”
{loadposition banbanlast}
 

TID Power Outage in Several Locations, Includes Downtown Turlock and Surrounding Streets

$
0
0
TID Power Outage in Several Locations, Includes Downtown Turlock and Surrounding Streets
There are many reports of power outages at businesses in the Turlock Downtown area, along with several other surrounding streets. At approximately 7:20 p.m., reports of power outages were being posted on social media.
There are many reports of power outages at businesses in the Turlock Downtown area, along with several other surrounding streets.

At approximately 7:20 p.m., reports of power outages were being posted on social media.
{loadposition banban}
Posts were being made stating that the power was out on Main Street, Center Street, N. First Street, Pioneer Avenue, Lander Avenue, Florence Street, off of Canal Drive, and more.

At about 7:25 p.m. the Turlock Fire Department let the public know that there was a car vs. pole on Chestnut Street, near the Turlock Irrigation District facility, and that TID was on scene.

TurlockCityNews.com will report any updates as soon as we receive released information.
{loadposition banbanlast}

Councilman Esquer Says Councilwoman Bublak Was Blindsided, Mayor Soiseth Still Won’t Answer Questions

$
0
0
Councilman Esquer Says Councilwoman Bublak Was Blindsided, Mayor Soiseth Still Won’t Answer Questions
After Mayor Gary Soiseth stripped three appointments from Councilwoman Amy Bublak, and with a reason that’s still drawing questions that Mayor Soiseth won’t answer, Councilman Gil Esquer has apologized to Councilwoman Bublak while saying that he didn’t think it should’ve happened. Most everyone was surprised or shocked when Mayor Soiseth stripped Councilwoman Bublak of three appointments and dispersed one to each of the three Councilmen at the Sept. 26 Turlock City Council meeting. Mayor Soiseth had communicated with Councilmen Bill DeHart, Matthew Jacob, and Gil Esquer before the meeting regarding the decision, while Councilwoman Amy Bublak was not even given a courtesy notice that she would not be serving as a representative of Turlock on some regional committees.
After Mayor Gary Soiseth stripped three appointments from Councilwoman Amy Bublak, and with a reason that’s still drawing questions that Mayor Soiseth won’t answer, Councilman Gil Esquer has apologized to Councilwoman Bublak while saying that he didn’t think it should’ve happened.

Most everyone was surprised or shocked when Mayor Soiseth stripped Councilwoman Bublak of three appointments and dispersed one to each of the three Councilmen at the Sept. 26 Turlock City Council meeting. Mayor Soiseth had communicated with Councilmen Bill DeHart, Matthew Jacob, and Gil Esquer before the meeting regarding the decision, while Councilwoman Amy Bublak was not even given a courtesy notice that she would not be serving as a representative of Turlock on some regional committees.

As Councilwoman Bublak didn’t know why she was having three appointments taken away, Mayor Soiseth responded by saying that his decision was due to prior discussion regarding equity among Council.

“There needs to be more equity among our Council Members,” stated Mayor Soiseth, after two of three appointments had been made. “Councilmember Esquer had only one appointment, so this came to my attention so we’re trying to make sure there’s more equitable appointments among the Council Members. So, I think that’s where it is.”
{loadposition banban}
After the meeting, Mayor Soiseth would not answer questions regarding the decision, how it was handled, potential Brown Act violations, and what the equity was based on.

Councilman Esquer did respond via email stating that being only an alternate to three committees was by his own request.

“Being new to this position I need a learning curve until I grasp the actual processes of these committees.”

So with this, equity isn’t really possible as Councilman Esquer only has alternate positions, and by his own choice. Also, knowledge or experience is not equitable as first-year Councilman Esquer referenced in his lack of knowledge for what he was being appointed for, versus the third-term Councilwoman Bublak. 

Mayor Soiseth has continued to not answer follow up questions regarding what this equity is based on.
{loadposition banban2}
For regional or multi-agency appointments representing Turlock, Councilwoman Bublak was left with only 1 appointment and is an alternate for 1. Councilman DeHart has 3 appointments. Councilman Esquer has 0 and is an alternate for 3. Councilman Jacob 2 appointments and is an alternate for 1. Mayor Soiseth has 9 appointments as a representative of the City of Turlock with other agencies or in regional committees.

After TurlockCityNews.com did a public records request and followed up with questions to all the Council Members and reported the news to the public, Councilman Esquer publicly apologized to Councilwoman Bublak while making some comments near the end of the Nov. 14 City Council meeting.

“I feel that I personally need to apologize to Amy, because, and this is referring to what happened at the meeting with the committees. I was asked before the meeting if I would accept the alternate. Exactly what I told the Mayor, I don’t know anything about the regional water sub basin, but, sure. If you need help, I’ll jump in there,” stated Councilman Esquer. “I was not aware that you were not aware. And it seemed to me after information came out, I kinda felt that you got blindsided.”

“I just want to apologize, I don’t think that should’ve happened.”

Councilwoman Bublak accepted the apology and said, “Thank you.”

Mayor Soiseth said, “Well, thank you,” and went on to the next part of the Council Meeting.
{loadposition banbanlast}

TurlockCityNews.com has asked the City of Turlock if this would be a Brown Act violation, which is a majority of Council (three Turlock City Council Members) discussing voting or taking action on the public’s business but not in public or discussing an agendized item such as the appointments but behind the scenes.

There have been several allegations of Mayor Soiseth violating the Brown Act recently, however, the City of Turlock has not answered questions regarding them and has not even acknowledged that they’re looking into the allegations to have correctly operating government.

TurlockCityNews.com will continue to ask questions regarding policy setting, procedure, and protocol regarding elected officials’ decision making, while following up on allegations of Brown Act violations to hold government accountable and transparent.

{loadposition banban3}
 

Arrests Made in Donnelly Park Robberies

$
0
0
Lavina Perez and Shaun Santos were arrested for a series of robberies that have occurred at Donnelly Park. Santos was also charged with attempted murder. 11-06-17
On Tuesday, the Turlock Police Department informed the community that it was investigating a series of robberies which have taken place at Donnelly Park over the last three weeks. On Wednesday, TPD announced that it had arrested four suspects. There have been three separate robbery cases, all of them having similar characteristics. The robberies have occurred on different days of the week, but all of them have happened between 5:30 p.m. and 6 p.m.
On Tuesday, the Turlock Police Department informed the community that it was investigating a series of robberies which have taken place at Donnelly Park over the last three weeks. On Wednesday, TPD announced that it had arrested four suspects.

There have been three separate robbery cases, all of them having similar characteristics. The robberies have occurred on different days of the week, but all of them have happened between 5:30 p.m. and 6 p.m.

“As each incident has unfolded, the suspects have become increasingly more violent towards their victims,” stated Sergeant Russell Holeman.
{loadposition banban}
On Monday, Dec. 4, at approximately 6 p.m., Turlock Police Officers responded to the report of a robbery which had just occurred in the western parking lot of Donnelly Park. Upon arrival, officers located an adult male victim who had suffered life threatening injuries after being assaulted with an unknown weapon.

The victim was transported to an area hospital for treatment.


Turlock Police Department Detectives have arrested four suspects for their involvement in the recent robberies which have taken place at Donnelly Park. On Dec. 5, at about 7:30 p.m., Detectives arrested Shaun Santos, a 22 year old male Modesto resident, Lavinia Perez, a 38 year old female also residing in Modesto, and two male juveniles.
{loadposition banban2}
Investigators were able to identify the suspect vehicle, a white 2004 Kia Sedona with Nevada license plates, after reviewing surveillance video from an area business.

Using this information, Turlock Police Detectives, working in conjunction with Manteca Police Department, were able to locate the suspect vehicle in the City of Manteca. With the assistance of the California Highway Patrol and the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Department, Detectives were able to stop the suspect vehicle and its occupants in the City of Stockton.

According to Turlock Police, all four subjects were taken into custody without incident and booked into the Stanislaus County Jail and Stanislaus County Juvenile Hall.

Santos was booked for robbery and attempted murder. Perez and the male juveniles were booked for robbery. The weapons used in the robberies were located, as well as some of the stolen property.
{loadposition banban3}
“I am very proud of our Investigations Unit as they worked non-stop, following every lead for the last 24 hours. Their dedication to getting the job done resulted in the quick apprehension of these criminals,” said Turlock Police Chief Nino Amirfar. “We should all be proud of the combined efforts of not only your police department personnel, but also our partnering law enforcement organizations who assisted with this case.”

“The men and women of the Turlock Police Department will continue to work tirelessly to ensure our community is provided with the best police services possible. I am blessed and proud to be a part of this dedicated and noble organization.”

The Turlock Police Department is asking that anyone who may have witnessed these robberies occurring, or who may have seen the suspect vehicle at Donnelly Park around the time of these incidents to call Detective Frank Navarro (209) 664-7319.

You can also contact the Turlock Police Department’s Tip Line at (209) 668-5550 extension 6780 or email tpdtipline@turlock.ca.us.

The Turlock Police Department is an active participant in the Crime Stoppers Program. Callers can leave an anonymous tip by calling Crime Stoppers at (209) 521-4636 and may be eligible for a cash reward.
{loadposition banbanlast} 

Firefighters Respond to Smoke Coming From Walmart

$
0
0
Firefighters Respond to Smoke Coming From Walmart
The Turlock Fire Department responded to reports of a potential structure fire at WalMart on Thursday morning. Firefighters responded to Walmart, located at 2111 Fulkerth Road, on Thursday, shortly after 8 a.m. Upon arrival, crews encountered light smoke conditions issuing from the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) vents inside the business. Due to the size of the building and the number of HVAC units with potential involvement, multiple crews were needed to rapidly determine the source of the smoke.
The Turlock Fire Department responded to reports of a potential structure fire at WalMart on Thursday morning.

Firefighters responded to Walmart, located at 2111 Fulkerth Road, on Thursday, shortly after 8 a.m. Upon arrival, crews encountered light smoke conditions issuing from the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) vents inside the business. Due to the size of the building and the number of HVAC units with potential involvement, multiple crews were needed to rapidly determine the source of the smoke.
{loadposition banban}
Further investigation revealed the source as a small smoldering fire within one of the HVAC units located on the roof. The fire was quickly extinguished and overhauled.

Walmart management staff worked closely with Turlock Fire crews to ensure the store was safe and suitable to reopen for business.

The business was closed for approximately 2 hours.

Turlock Fire Department responded with Engine 34, Squad 32, Engine 31, Engine 33 and Battalion Chief 4. Turlock Rural provided City coverage as all Turlock Fire crews were on-scene for the duration of the incident.
{loadposition banbanlast}

Ballot to Protest Doubling Water Bills Due Tuesday, Many Unaware

$
0
0
Ballot to Protest Doubling Water Bills Due Tuesday, Many Unaware
On Tuesday night, the Turlock City Council will consider approving a water rate increase on customers that would double their bill over the next five years. The rate hike is to pay for improvements to the City’s drinking water system, including the construction of the $278 million Regional Surface Water Supply Project. Under Prop 218, at least 50 percent plus one written protests must be submitted in writing to stop the water rate increase that the City Council is expected to approve at the Dec. 12 public hearing during the City Council meeting starting at 6 p.m.
On Tuesday night, the Turlock City Council will consider approving a water rate increase on customers that would double their bill over the next five years. The rate hike is to pay for improvements to the City’s drinking water system, including the construction of the $278 million Regional Surface Water Supply Project.

Under Prop 218, at least 50 percent plus one written protests must be submitted in writing to stop the water rate increase that the City Council is expected to approve at the Dec. 12 public hearing during the City Council meeting starting at 6 p.m.
{loadposition banban}
Property owners and ratepayers received protest ballots in their utility bills for the water rate increase, sent out on Oct. 17. However, many renters were not sent these ballots in the mail as they are not the direct account holder. Renters can request a ballot at the City of Turlock or go online to the City of Turlock website and visit the Water Sewage and Garbage Services page.

With a water rate hike being recommended by City Staff to be approved by the City Council, some residents are hurrying to turn in their protest ballots. Many customers did not see their protest ballot or may not be able to find it, now.

Those who did not receive a ballot or lost it can find one online at the City of Turlock website. There, a PDF link (click here to view and download) describes the proposed increase to water rates, under Proposition 218 and provides a protest ballot.
{loadposition banban2}
The ballot explains that an owner or tenant of property that receives city water service may protest the proposed increased service charges by submitting a written protest by mail or in person to the City of Turlock, City Clerk, 156 S. Broadway, Ste. 230, Turlock, CA 95380. This means that all written protests must be received (not postmarked) by the City before or up to the conclusion of the public hearing on Dec. 12.

Also, according to the ballot, “Each protest must (1) be in writing;
(2) state opposition to the proposed water rate increase; (3) provide the
location of the identified parcel (by assessor's parcel number or street address);
and (4) include the original signature of the customer submitting the protest.”

Only one written protest per customer will be counted towards the protest.
{loadposition banban3}

The ballot also notes that any protest submitted by email or other electronic means will not be accepted.


Rates would increase from $36 per month to about $80 per month, using the City’s calculation example.


The public hearing where protests will be heard and the written protests tabulated will take place that the Turlock City Council meeting, to be held at 6 p.m. in the Yosemite Room of City Hall, located at 156 S. Broadway Avenue.
{loadposition banbanlast}

Former Turlock Councilman, Budget Guru Ted Howze Enters Congressional Election Race

$
0
0
Former Turlock Councilman, Budget Guru Ted Howze Enters Congressional Election Race
The former Turlock City Council Member, who found $5,000,000 in budget accounts not identified by City Staff during the Great Recession and led the development of an industrial park with high-paying jobs, is running for Congress. Ted Howze broke the news early in an email to TurlockCityNews.com.
The former Turlock City Council Member, who found $5,000,000 in budget accounts not identified by City Staff during the Great Recession and led the development of an industrial park with high-paying jobs, is running for Congress. That's right, Ted Howze is coming back into politics and to serve Turlock once again.

TurlockCityNews.com received the breaking news this morning announcing the late election race entry by Ted Howze.

As a former top vote-getting Turlock City Councilman, who served from 2006 through 2010, Howze proved to be a budget guru while helping to save Turlock during the Great Recession.

Howze has a long history of community involvement in Turlock, Stanislaus County, and the surrounding region. Howze has worked as a large animal veterinarian involved primarily in the local dairy industry for the past 24 years, served two terms on the City of Turlock Planning Commission, and one term as a Turlock City Council Member - where as Vice Mayor he represented Turlock on the Stanislaus County Council of Governments.

Howze is often credited by those who have worked with him as being the masterful architect of Turlock's budgets during one of America’s greatest economic disasters in 2006-2010. During that time he found millions of dollars that he claimed were being fraudulently hidden in abandoned unemployment and disability insurance accounts, money that was being used to secretly cover up a sinking City employee health insurance plan which was subsequently righted. City Management claimed that they were just following protocol and keeping the money there conservatively, despite the City holding budget workshops and major job/expenditure cuts were being made to survive the recession.

The former Councilman also prioritized public safety, truly and financially, as he developed a sustainable funding plan which expanded the number of Turlock's Police and Fire personnel.

Howze is most notably remembered for accurately predicting more than a year in advance that Governor Jerry Brown would move to confiscate all Redevelopment Agency funding from California's cities. While some said it would never happen, Howze forged ahead with two Republican Council colleagues and developed a project plan which amplified $20 million dollars in redevelopment funding into over $60 million dollars of funding for local projects - from the new Public Safety Facility to rebuilding the burned down Carnegie Arts Center.

The crown jewel in Howze's plan that he feels still has the most potential to benefit the Turlock community and Stanislaus region, the project he personally championed as critical to the region, was the Turlock Regional Industrial Park (previously known as the Westside Industrial Specific Plan). The industrial development and job creation initiative took off after the investment of more than $14 million dollars of redevelopment funding poured into the construction of the water and sewer infrastructure to make the region’s prime “shovel ready” industrial park. That project alone has created hundreds of new high-paying jobs to Turlock and the surrounding communities by employers like Blue Diamond Growers, Valley Milk, and Hilmar Cheese.

Howze has returned to politics in 2018 after a long hiatus following the untimely death of his first wife Sharon in 2013. Now happily re-married and with all three of his sons off to college, Howze said, "The timing just seemed right in light of the dysfunction in Washington D.C."

Asked about running against incumbent Congressman Jeff Denham, a fellow Republican whom he once supported, Howze said, "I harbor no ill will against Jeff, we just disagree on the way an elected official should represent their constituents.”

During the campaign, Howze said that he would be communicating with the constituents as much as possible by answering questions and addressing comments on Facebook, while also using Instagram and Twitter. Knowing TurlockCityNews.com's agenda of improved communication, Howze challenged us to follow up and see if he engages with people on Facebook - because he does what he says. He also asked us to note if anyone else works as hard to answer questions and communicate with constituents on the popular social media.

“Jeff, his staff and his millions of dollars campaign team can’t or won’t communicate and answer questions from his constituency, but I will.”

If elected, Howze promised to be personally in attendance for several annual town hall style meetings plus hold more significant office hours around the District. California's 10th Congressional District is made up of Stanislaus County and the San Joaquin County cities of Ripon, Manteca, and Tracy.

With a crowded Democratic field that will include 7 other candidates on the ballot, what would separate Howze from them?

"I really don’t feel their message of socialism and the higher taxes that goes with it plays well in an economic region where we all work very hard for our crumbs.”

TurlockCityNews.com will have more background information on Ted Howze as we covered the very difficult era of the Great Recession and how he led our City and community through that with time with great budget analysis, more communication than any elected official to date, and action not empty words.

For now, check out his initial campaign website, www.tedhowze.com, or follow him on Twitter @ted_howze

Rob Santos, TID Director: San Francisco Responsible for Half of Water Demanded by State

$
0
0
Rob Santos, DVM - Turlock Irrigation District Board Member
San Francisco is on the hook for half of our 40% unimpaired flows -  The California State Water Resource Control Board (State Water Board) recently released their final Substitute Environmental Document (SED), which requires the people of the Turlock and Modesto Irrigation Districts (TID, MID) to release an additional 40% unimpaired Tuolumne River water between February and June into the Bay-Delta.
San Francisco is on the hook for half of our 40% unimpaired flows.

The California State Water Resource Control Board (State Water Board) recently released their final Substitute Environmental Document (SED), which requires the people of the Turlock and Modesto Irrigation Districts (TID, MID) to release an additional 40% unimpaired Tuolumne River water between February and June into the Bay-Delta. That means allowing on average over 500,000 acre-feet of water to flow naturally down the river into the ocean without being stored in a reservoir or diverted for irrigation or drinking water. To put that number in perspective, that amount of water is about equal to the surface water provided to all TID farms in a good hydrology year.

Why is the State Water Board doing this?

The Bay-Delta is about to get more salty. For the past 50 years Sacramento River water flowed through the Bay-Delta, mixing with San Joaquin River water before being pumped into the California Aqueduct and transported to Southern California. When the Governor’s Twin Tunnels are built they will siphon millions of acre-feet of Sacramento River water under the Bay-Delta and into the California Aqueduct. Without that Sacramento River water flowing into the Bay-Delta, more water is needed from the San Joaquin River’s tributaries (Tuolumne, Stanislaus, and Merced Rivers) to dilute the Bay-Delta.

Now I know that the State Water Board will say the 40% unimpaired flows is all about saving the salmon and not about the Twin Tunnels.

If that were true they would say what the end goal looks like (they can’t), they wouldn’t negotiate separately between the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers stakeholders for different flow rates (they are), and they wouldn’t ignore scientific studies that say the 40% flow rate won’t help the salmon (they ignore it).

Why?

Because when you look at the bottom line, it’s all about the Twin Tunnels.

This 40% unimpaired flow requirement is on top of our 1996 agreement with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for river releases for salmon restoration, which amount to up to 14% unimpaired flow or on average 300,000 acre-feet per year. In the 1996 agreement our Tuolumne River management partner, the City and County of San Francisco (CCSF), agreed to pay the Turlock and Modesto Irrigation Districts for San Francisco’s portion of Tuolumne River water release requirements.

This was important to San Francisco because they would not give up one drop of the municipal, industrial, or commercial water that they pull from the Tuolumne River at Hetch Hetchy. Instead they chose to exchange their required fish water allotment for cash, and let the districts bear the brunt of less water for their customers.

I will not let this happen again.

When the New Don Pedro was built in 1971, CCSF helped pay for 51% of the dam’s construction cost. For this investment San Francisco received 51% of the available water (570,000 acre-feet) in a “virtual reservoir” in New Don Pedro; we call it a water bank. This means that San Francisco can operate their water storage system higher up the Tuolumne River (the reservoirs at Hetch Hetchy, Cherry Lake, and Lake Eleanor) “as if” they had an additional reservoir with the capacity of 570,000 acre feet.

If the SED is going to require that an additional 40% of Tuolumne River water flow into the Bay-Delta, then San Francisco is on the hook for 51% of this “block of water.”

That means that if 500,000 acre-feet of water needs to flow unimpaired down the Tuolumne River, then 250,000 of that needs to come from San Francisco’s block of water. As partners we all have enjoyed the benefits of Tuolumne River water, and as partners we all have to share the burdens also.

It is not right to expect TID and MID farmers and ratepayers to once again reduce their water usage while San Francisco does not.

In this new era of climate change, Don Pedro Reservoir will be empty much more often than in the past, and with an additional 40% unimpaired flow requirement, when Don Pedro is empty, TID farmers will get no surface water in order to farm. However, the impact will be mitigated if a portion of the flow comes from San Francisco’s block of water.

For the past 20 years our farmers have employed water conservation methods to meet the challenges of dry years and FERC flow requirements. Likewise, CCSF can use conservation methods to mitigate their loss of water in helping reduce the salinity of the Bay-Delta. In fact, they could even do more by sending their water all the way down the Tuolumne River and into the Delta instead of bypassing the natural river through a series of tunnels 167 miles long that pull water directly from Hetch Hetchy.

San Francisco, we do not want your money - we need half of the water demanded.


Dr. Rob Santos, DVM is a practicing veterinarian and managing partner at Monte Vista Small Animal Hospital, Community Veterinary Clinic, and Family Pet Mortuary while representing Division 4 as a Board Director of the Turlock Irrigation District since 2007. Dr. Santos is currently the Vice President of the TID Board.

Where Are San Francisco’s Big Fish in the State Water Grab?

$
0
0
Rob Santos, DVM - Turlock Irrigation District Board Member
Understanding the 1966 Fourth Agreement and the 1996 Agreement
I don’t understand is why the San Francisco ratepayers, water users, and the powerful politicians who call San Francisco their home aren’t angry. The local city leaders get it. The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), the folks who handle San Francisco’s water supply; they get it. They know what the impact will be on San Francisco’s municipal, commercial, and industrial users, and it is dire.

Understanding the 1966 Fourth Agreement and the 1996 Agreement

I understand why farmers and ratepayers in the Turlock and Modesto Irrigation Districts (TID and MID) are angry.

They know the State Water Board’s proposal (the SED) to require an additional 40-50% of unimpaired water flows down the Tuolumne River is going to decimate our local economy. They know that the water demanded by the State Water Board is critical to the Governor’s plan to build twin tunnels that will suck up to 5 million acre-feet of water from the Sacramento River, bypassing the Delta, and sending it South of the Delta. They know that science shows that these increased flows alone are not going to save the salmon. They know that the State Water Board ignored the Districts’ scientific studies and non-flow measures to increase the number of salmon on the Tuolumne River. They know that the majority of the Water Board members have already made up their minds. And they know that folks who suggest farmers fallow their land during dry seasons or switch their crops are delusional and don’t have a clue about agricultural business practices in Stanislaus County.

But what I don’t understand is why the San Francisco ratepayers, water users, and the powerful politicians who call San Francisco their home aren’t angry. The local city leaders get it. The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), the folks who handle San Francisco’s water supply; they get it. They know what the impact will be on San Francisco’s municipal, commercial, and industrial users, and it is dire. Why? A short history of the marriage between San Francisco and the TID/MID water districts will provide some answers.

We must first start with an act of the United States Congress. In 1913 the Raker Act allowed San Francisco to construct Lake Eleanor Dam and O’Shaughnessy Dam on the upper Tuolumne River, creating Lake Eleanor and Hetch Hetchy Reservoir. From just below the dam, Tuolumne River water is pulled into the Hetch Hetchy water system. Through a labyrinth of pipelines, pumping stations, and tunnels about 300,000 acre-feet of Tuolumne River water is delivered to San Francisco each year. The water is so clean the city doesn’t have to filter it for its 2.6 million users. Along the way, power stations generate hydropower. The Hetch Hetchy Reservoir can store 360,000 acre-feet of water, but the combined storage in the Hetch Hetchy System is 650,000 acre-feet. That entire system includes three dams and reservoirs on tributaries that feed into the Tuolumne River - Cherry Lake, Lake Eleanor, and Hetch Hetchy Reservoir.

Because TID and MID had senior water rights over San Francisco’s junior water rights on the Tuolumne River, the construction of a dam further up the river created great consternation. The Districts fought San Francisco tooth and nail. Concessions in the Raker Act sought to ease those concerns, but details about how to share access to the river needed constant refining. From 1940 to 1949 a series of agreements (named the First, Second, and Third Agreements) worked out details about how TID, MID, and San Francisco would develop and share the Tuolumne River. In particular those agreements approved two major projects designed to provide additional water storage and improve flood control on the Tuolumne River. The first project to be built was Cherry Reservoir (completed in 1956), which was owned by San Francisco, followed by the New Don Pedro Reservoir (completed in 1971), which would be owned by the Districts.

Related Prior Article by Rob SantosTID Director:
"San Francisco Responsible for Half of Water Demanded by State"


In 1966 the Fourth Agreement spelled out the details of how the New Don Pedro Reservoir, with 2,300,000 acre-feet of water storage, would operate.

* TID and MID received 1,120,000 acre-feet

* San Francisco received 570,000 acre-feet, but would not take that water out of New Don Pedro Reservoir. Instead the City would pull its “share” of Don Pedro water directly from Hetch Hetchy. This process is referred to as a water bank or a virtual dam within New Don Pedro.

* The Districts assumed full responsibility for federal flood protection (340,000 acre-feet). Prior to that Old Don Pedro, Cherry Lake, and Hetch Hetchy provided flood control protection, meaning each had to keep some space in their reservoirs empty so that in the case of a major storm, there was somewhere for the water to go.

* TID and MID, as owners of New Don Pedro, were licensed by the Federal Power Commission (FERC) to operate it. A clause in the Fourth Agreement noted that if FERC asked for additional water releases, San Francisco would have to provide 52% of the flows and the Districts 48%.

And that is exactly what happened in the early 1990s. During the license renewal process, FERC increased the amount of water that had to flow freely from the New Don Pedro Reservoir. Specifically it called for an additional 14% (on average) of full natural water flows that was to be shared between the Districts and San Francisco “as prescribed in the Fourth Agreement.” That meant that just over half of the additional water flows had to come from San Francisco’s share of the water. For three years the parties fought and wrangled. San Francisco said it could not give up that much of its water without significant water supply impacts.

Ultimately the 1996 Agreement was reached in which San Francisco paid TID and MID $3.5 million a year in exchange for the Districts giving up all 14% of the water.

This brings us to today, and the State Water Board requirement that Tuolumne River provide an additional 40% of water flows. San Francisco informed the Water Board that because of the Fourth Agreement they may have to provide 52 % of the unimpaired water flows and paying the Districts to cover their portion is not going to be an option. If San Francisco couldn’t give up a small amount of its water back in 1996, how is it going to give up 20% today? Even with extreme conservation methods, it is not going to be enough.

So where are the voices of protest from their powerful political representatives? Senator Dianne Feinstein? Lt Governor Gavin Newsom? House Speaker Nancy Pelosi? You are some of the most powerful politicians in the United States - We need you in this fight. Your San Francisco economy is in great peril.

Your marriage partners, the farmers and ratepayers of Stanislaus County, know water is precious. Our farmers are the most progressive in the agricultural world. They have invested heavily in equipment and processes that allow them to only use enough water on their crops as needed.

Together our Districts and San Francisco have spent millions on salmon restoration projects on the Tuolumne River. If the State Water Board’s demand for 40-50% of unimpaired flows (the SED) is approved as is, I believe our Districts will need to renegotiate the 1996 Agreement allowing San Francisco to pay the Districts $3.5 million a year for their environmental fish flows. We need every drop of water that our senior water rights on the Tuolumne River allow us.


First Article in Our Water Series by Rob Santos:

"Rob Santos, TID Director: San Francisco Responsible for Half of Water Demanded by State"




Dr. Rob Santos, DVM is a practicing veterinarian and managing partner at Monte Vista Small Animal Hospital, Community Veterinary Clinic, and Family Pet Mortuary while representing Division 4 as a Board Director of the Turlock Irrigation District since 2007. Dr. Santos is currently the Vice President of the TID Board.




Latest Images